FLS Mods! Haiti help! & a new pattern

February 21st, 2010 pam Posted in contests, crochet, february lady sweater, patterns 2 Comments »

ITEM 1: It’s done! I read all of your helpful feedback about your modifications to the February Lady Sweater pattern, and I put all that wisdom together on its very own page.

Lauren wrote lucky comment #17 (chosen by the Random Number Generator), and is the winner of a $20 gift certificate to the A Verb for Keeping Warm online store.

ITEM 2: In other news, sales of Pickadilly and Elinor’s Mittens generated a whopping $279 for Partners in Health and Doctors Without Borders. I chipped in a few more dollars, and sent a $150 donation to each organization. Big thanks to everyone who bought a pattern to support relief efforts in Haiti. There’s still so much to be done, even though Ravelry’s “help Haiti” promotion has ended. If you want to keep giving by knitting, check out Elinor Brown’s beautiful Helping Hands Mittens, as well as her thoughtful notes about giving and getting.

ITEM 3: Finally, I have a new pattern out in the March/April 2010 issue of Crochet Today magazine.

Natty Neck Ruff
picture from Crochet Today

pattern: Natty Neck Ruff, by Pamela Wynne
yarn: Debbie Stoller Stitch Nation Bamboo Ewe
[raveled]

Because who doesn’t need an Elizabethan neck ruff? In fact, I’m pretty sure Crush needs one asap.

This issue of Crochet Today (which is on shelves right now, people) is worth buying for lots of awesome–and much more functional than a neck ruff–designs. Maryse’s potholders and Lauren’s pillows are fanTAStic.

I was excited to work with the new Debbie Stoller Stitch Nation yarn. I like the idea of high quality yarn being affordable and widely available, and the bold colors of the new Stitch Nation line stand out pretty fabulously from the usual hunter greens and variegated pastels of the big box craft store yarn aisle.

The Bamboo Ewe (55% viscose from Bamboo, 45% Wool) was easy on my fingers, and has a subtle sheen from the bamboo viscose. The viscose content softens up the rough wool and makes it totally pleasant to crochet with.

Natty Neck Ruff
picture from Crochet Today

Clara Parkes, my and everyone else’s favorite Yarn Whisperer, wrote a preview of the yarn line in which she mentions the new Federal Trade Commission standards for labeling fibers made from bamboo-derived viscose. Those fabrics and yarns, the FTC says, are really rayon, not bamboo. While this does raise, as Clara notes, some real questions about the Stitch Nation marketing campaign advertising Bamboo Ewe as “100% natural,” it’s also what makes the yarn so affordable (because, clearly, real mechanically-processed bamboo yarn is not gonna be widely available for $5/ball). And the viscose content in Bamboo Ewe does its job, adding softness and lustre to inexpensive wool.

What’s more, while the viscose process is usually toxic and not especially “green,” at least it’s a petroleum-free alternative to the oil-based acrylic fiber that softens most craft store yarns.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

open source sweater design — pass it on!

January 14th, 2010 pam Posted in contests, february lady sweater, patterns 92 Comments »

FLS

Fact: As of 4:46pm on January 14, there are 7,767 February Lady Sweater project pages on Ravelry and many more unRaveled FLSs roaming free out in the world (eep!).

PLUS

Fact: As I’ve said before, that pattern has plenty of flaws. It was my first real try at sizing a sweater. I wrote it up quickly (and, stupidly, without the expert help of any editors or designers with more knowledge and experience than I have). It’s no gem, but folks have used it as a launching pad and worked with it to make many pretty things.

EQUALS

Every one of those thousands of people who have knit a February Lady Sweater has experience with and insight into modifying the original pattern to make it what they wanted to knit and wear. Increases have been altered! Sleeves have been narrowed! Yokes have been tweaked! Unfortunately, that knowledge is spread out over countless online forums and knitting groups and classes and yarn shops and individual knitter brains.

So let’s gather it up!

I’m issuing a call for anyone who’s made the February Lady Sweater (and I mean anyone, whether it was your first sweater project or you used it to teach your hundredth knitting class) to share their expertise. What modifications did you make? What issues/problems did you encounter, and how did you fix them? Let’s talk fit, obviously, but also design, technique, yarn choice, whatever. In a month or so, I’ll go through the comments here, gather up all the input, synthesize the information, and barf it out into some kind of organized clearinghouse of tips and tricks as a resource for future FLS knitters.

Plus? a commenter chosen at random on February 14 will receive a $20 coupon to the A Verb for Keeping Warm online store. Equals? awesome.

So pass on your knowledge and experience, and pass this call on to your friends and fellow knitters. Future knitters will thank you!

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

let’s talk.

April 9th, 2009 pam Posted in blogging, february lady sweater, patterns, politics 154 Comments »

Let's Get Physical!

[utterly ridiculous handspun, handknit sweatbands. raveled]

ETA: I’ve edited some of the language here in my discussion of NAMELESS LYS. It seems more useful to stay focused on the broader culture here, rather than on the practices of a single shop. I want to be very, very clear that (1) I am not advocating — or myself practicing — any kind of boycott, or change in shopping habits; (2) this is not a problem limited to or reducible to a single shop; (3) I like, respect, and admire all of the LYSs where I regularly shop; and (4) I initially “named names” in this post because I am saddened that even otherwise-amazing shops seem to fail in this regard. And I think that failure warrants both discussion and some accountability. But I’m also lazy, and poor, and ill equipped to deal with accusations of slander. So, I did some editing instead. Those of you whose comments I edited, please forgive me, and please contact me if I need to grovel further.

In June 2008, I wrote up a tutorial for a sweater I had knit, thinking that some of my friends might like to make one too. Today, 10 months later, more than 5,000 Ravelry users (and probably a few other knitters too) have used that tutorial to make their own February Lady Sweaters.

That is so totally fucking awesome. All I did was execute some basic math and write down some simple instructions, and from that, I’ve gotten a crash course in knitting design, met loads of fascinating new people, and learned heaps about the indie craft world.

Unfortunately, one of the things I’ve learned the hard way is that not everyone bothers to honor the guidelines designers set out for how their work can be used. My free patterns page has always said that my patterns may not be used for commercial purposes, but I’ve been adding to that statement a lot in the last 10 months, as people have failed to honor it. As of today, it’s nine sentences long.

If you do a Google search or a Ravelry search for paid classes using the FLS pattern, you will find dozens and dozens of them, all over the country. They charge anywhere from $20 to $100 for the classes, plus materials. Only nine stores have honored my request that they get my permission to use the pattern for classes — which I granted, with some very reasonable terms. The rest of those stores, whether they realize it or not, are exploiting my labor and my free pattern to make a profit, without my consent.

The pattern is free for anyone to download and use and share. All I ask is that folks not use it for profit. Or, if a store wants to use it for a class, that they contact me first and honor my (again, v. minimal) terms.

My issue is not that I’m looking to make money off this pattern myself. There are a number of reasons why I chose not to charge for the FLS pattern. First, the design concept is not mine — it’s Elizabeth Zimmermann’s. Second, I made no great innovation here — I used the innovations of Barbara Walker and Elizabeth Zimmermann to create something new(ish). Finally, and most importantly, I believe that Sharing is better than Capitalism and indie is better than corporate — which is why I love local yarn stores, and is also why it fills me with livid, unholy fury to see these same businesses profiting from my free work without my consent.

I want to support local yarn stores. And I know that classes are an important way for them to sell yarn and to get folks in the door. Because of this, whenever an independent yarn shop has contacted me and asked to use my pattern for a class, I’ve always said yes, provided they give me credit for my work.

But, oftentimes, they don’t ask. They take. And the biggest concern for me is that they don’t give credit, either. If you check out the newsletters and calendars and class announcements for the stores using my pattern without my consent, you’ll see that almost none of them mention my name or my web site. Almost none of them provide a link to the pattern or the blog, or credit me for the photos they’ve stolen (and, sometimes, altered).

And, as much as I’ve been all “me me me” up to this point, it’s not just me. There’s a definite pattern of abuse when it comes to yarn stores using free online patterns for profit, without crediting designers. When I contacted my very favorite yarn shop, NAMELESS LYS, after I noticed that they were offering an FLS class without notifying me (and without crediting me in any way), they immediately changed the language on their promotional materials, linking to my site and including my name. Two weeks later, though, the class description in their newsletter was back to its original language, full of passive voice (the baby sweater “has been upsized”), and empty of credit. Today, my name and web site appear nowhere in their newsletter’s description of the class, which they seem to be offering for a second time. Moreover, while they temporarily changed the blurb for the FLS class, they didn’t change any of the other descriptions for any other classes, or their descriptions of their new shop models, or the “freebies” in their newsletter that link directly to PDF files — all of which almost always fail to mention pattern designers.

Let’s be clear, though, that this shop is not alone — they’re simply, for me, the most personally disappointing example of this widespread phenomenon. Almost no yarn shops give any kind of credit to independent or web-based designers when they advertise classes. Perhaps they don’t want to give links to free patterns, because they don’t want potential students to get the pattern on their own and skip the class. I understand why this tactic might makes sense to them, and am sympathetic to the challenges facing brick-and-mortar stores these days, but this is no way to treat the independent designers and crafters who make the free patterns that make those classes possible.

I get that many LYSs are struggling to figure out how to negotiate the online craft world, particularly in an economic moment when luxury items like full-price yarn might not fit into many people’s budgets (if they ever did). Well, here’s a primer: in Kate’s words, “DON’T BE A JERK.” In other words, don’t do things online that you wouldn’t do in the “real” world. Because the internets? ARE the real world. I am real. My labor is real. My intellectual property rights? Real.

It’s pretty simple: DON’T BE A JERK. ASK BEFORE YOU TAKE MY STUFF.

If we do that? If we treat each other like human beings instead of just businesses or resources for plundering? Then local yarn stores can only benefit, can only earn better reputations for themselves, can only set themselves further apart from the JoAnns and the Michaels and the fucking Hobby Lobbies. Because then they make themselves an indispensable part of a respectful, personal, supportive local and global community, in a way that that JoAnn and Michael can never touch.

That first Google search yesterday floored me. I am overwhelmed by the scope of this. After I post this, I’m going to draft a friendly e-mail to send to the yarn shops that are using my pattern and/or images without my consent. But I have a life. I work. I knit. I play. I snorgle kitties. I do not have time to be the pattern police. And I don’t know what to do here.

I’m posting this partly just to vent, and partly to bounce my thoughts off the internets. (Am I crazy? Are my expectations — that LYS owners will comply with my terms of use by attributing my work to me, and asking permission before using my free stuff for profit — unreasonable?) Knitters, what are your expectations for the classes you take? Teachers, how do you navigate these issues in teaching classes? More experienced designers, how do you handle this stuff with your free patterns?

I ask these questions because the main reason I’m posting is that I’d like to think we can make some change here. Knitters! Post about this on your own blog, or in the Ravelry forums, and link back to me, and to Kate, and to each other. My hope here is that, if we can create (ETA: or continue) some kind of high-profile online dialogue among knitters, we might educate one another, and inspire each other to demand ethical and honest business practices from our otherwise badass LYSs.

Blog on! xo, Pam

ETA: So many fabulous LYS owners have contacted me about their FLS classes now that I’ve taken down the list of the 9 stores who had contacted me at the time of posting. Thank you!

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

yep. I’m an asshole.

June 8th, 2008 pam Posted in despair, february lady sweater, patterns, wilma 49 Comments »

ETA: MORE maths corrected, plus I added sizes XS and XXS. Check out the revised sizing. The re-worked file was created on June 10 at 2:50pm, and should say “Version 2.0″ at the top.

As soon as a zillion people started queuing my sweater pattern on Ravelry, I knew I was going to find a huge mistake. I just knew it.

And guess what!

I surely did!

Like, a really big one.

A really, really, massively big one.

Luckily, it’s not til after the raglan increases, so hopefully not many people have gotten that far yet. But, yeah, that part where it says to add 13 yarn-overs? That’s bunk. It’s supposed to be a number between 38 and 41, depending on your size. I have no idea where the number 13 came from. Let’s not even discuss it.

If you downloaded the pattern before June 9 at 12:30am Eastern US time, get the new one!

And please enjoy this recycled photo of my cat Wilma wearing yarn.

I mean, how can you be angry at someone who has such a precious kitty? Answer: you cannot.

Thanks in advance for your patience and generosity and not, you know, kicking my ass or sending hate mail.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

woo, lady sweaters! a few notes on patterns, etc.

June 8th, 2008 pam Posted in contests, february lady sweater, patterns, socks, sweaters, zimmermania 36 Comments »

If you haven’t entered the contest for the woolgirl.com gift certificate, there’s still time! Go! Go!

Big thanks for all the kind responses to the February Lady Sweater!

If you’re interested in making a version that’s more faithful to Elizabeth Zimmerman’s original, several folks have made larger versions of the original baby sweater, by doing some serious math. I mentioned Jenny’s in my last post (could she be any cuter?), and you should also check out this super-gorgeous version. In fact, I just found out that Ravelry has a whole discussion going on about how to re-work the math for an adult size, with a few pictures of finished ones. (Shoulda known–there’s a Ravelry thread for everything.) And someone even made a grown-up version just by using superbulky yarn and the original pattern.

EZ’s original baby sweater is, of course, fucking brilliant in its construction. It has a lot of increases over a small number of rows, to create a rounded shape that will suit a wee baby’s round body. The pattern I wrote, on the other hand, is just a basic top-down raglan. This construction means that, instead of fitting a baby’s round body, it’s made to be fitted across an adult’s shoulders and upper back, then drape all swingy-like down from the bust (yeah, no, I could not get a job writing for J. Peterman). If you’re familiar with top-down raglan construction, you really don’t even need the pattern, just this one-sentence command: “knit a top-down raglan using EZ’s gull stitch pattern, with a row of 40-45 increases just above the bust.”

Finally, some folks have emailed because they’ve had problems making the raglan increases work. The issue seems to be around the phrase, “mark the next stitch.” This is not the same as “place a marker.” Rather, you mark the next stitch you knit. You can either place a marker on either side of that stitch, or slide a split ring marker through the knitted stitch, so that you know to put a m1 increase on either side of it for the raglan shaping. If you’re good at reading your knitting, you don’t even need a marker–just increase on either side of the same stitch each time. Hope this helps! (I’ll also go clarify in the pattern itself.)

I do actually have other knitting projects, too! I just started a pair of Sandra’s Charade socks in some Wollmeise sockenwolle that Kris sent me a while back.

But I’m not sure I love the striping. Should I embrace the striping? Or frog it and find a better pattern/yarn match? I beg you, be ruthless in your advice

AddThis Social Bookmark Button